The focus group discussion included the following topics at the two sessions held on April 9, 2024:
- The “idea” recreation department
- Importance of recreation amenities and programs
- Potential funding sources
- Opportunities for private and/or public partnerships
Focus group participants suggested an advisory board, but its practicality, benefits, and drawbacks were not discussed. According to page 3 of the Recreation Department Focus Group Report (dated May 9, 2024), it was noted:
“Establishing a governmental Parks & Recreation oversight or advisory board was also suggested. However, this is not practical based on the size of the organization staff and small department jurisdiction. Moreover, the city charter indicates that the City Commission established policy and budget for the City.”
In the Recommendation Section on page 4 further states:
“ Again, the need for a governmental parks and recreation oversight committee or advisory board is not recommended or practical. However, establishing a non-governmental ad-hoc committee, consisting of stakeholders and residents, may prove advantageous in gaining input on a potential millage and enhancing the sense of ownership for a successful millage campaign.”
For more details on the topic, see my post, “Should the City Establish a Parks & Recreation Advisory Board?”
Click this LINK to review the Recreation Department Focus Group Report.